by Michael A. Hoffman II
Copyright 2005 by http://www.revisionisthistory.org
All Rights Reserved
Reproduced by permission of the copyright holder
The late Pope John Paul II was a crypto-rabbi and his pontificate represented, for diabolical infiltrators, a supreme coup. He became the first pope in the history of Christendom to enter an accursed synagogue, the den of the Talmudic Pharisees. Orthodox Judaism esteems the Talmud as its supreme guide. The Talmud states that Jesus Christ was a sorcerer and the son of a whore named Miriam the hairdresser. The Talmud declares that Jesus Christ is in hell being boiled in hot excrement. The Talmud gloats over Christ's crucifixion and early death and says He got what He deserved.
John Paul II was delighted to engender scandal and confusion and enter the very temple of the Pharisees that espoused these mortal sins of calumny and blasphemy. He considered it one of the crowning "ecumenical" achievements of his papacy, along with encouraging the practitioners of Voodoo in Benin, Africa to remain in their bloody cult of demon worship and ritual sacrifice, by declaring that Voodoo contains the "Seeds of the Word"! (Cf. L'Osservatore Romano," 10 February 1993). Thanks to John Paul's recognition of the "Seeds of the Word" in Voodoo, three years after his visit, the government of Benin conferred upon Voodoo the status of "an officially recognized religion." (cf. Associated Press dispatch, January 11, 1996).
But it was in the matter of Judaism that this Pope earned his immunity from the media of the West, who might quibble about his refusal to priest women, but sat in unabashed awe at his unprecedented Talmudic statements and doctrines. For example, in Vatican City on Halloween, 1997, John Paul II declared:"In the Christian world -- I am not saying on the part of the Church as such --the wrong and unjust interpretations of the New Testament relating to the Jewish people and their supposed guilt [in Christ's death] circulated for too long, engendering sentiments of hostility toward this people. This contributed to a lulling of consciences, so that when Europe was engulfed by a wave of persecutions inspired by a pagan anti-Semitism...the spiritual resistance of many was not what humanity had a right to expect from the disciples of Christ."
Could any more fraud be packed into one paragraph than the palimpsest of Halloween masquerade that the late John Paul II managed in the preceding statement? There is no ignominy to which this prelate would not stoop in his obeisance to contemporary Talmudic Pharisees, who are the direct spiritual heirs of the assassins of Jesus Christ.
"Wrong and unjust interpretations of the New Testament relating to the Jewish people and their supposed guilt in Christ's death..."
"Supposed" guilt? The Talmud itself, in Sanhedrin 43a, admits that the Jewish leadership had Christ killed. In fact, Sanhedrin 43a celebrates Christ's execution!
Historic Catholicism has always believed in the "supposed guilt" of the Judaic leadership in the killing of the Lord Jesus, and the killing of the prophets, and that the Jewish leadership were contrary to all men. That incidentally is not an "interpretation," it's a direct quote from Sacred Scripture (I Thessalonians 2:14-15), which John Paul II negated and betrayed.
John Paul II made constant reference to the Nazi "Holocaust." Yet as a Pole, he knew very well that a disproportionate number of the perpetrators of an unsung holocaust against Polish Christians had been Judaic Communists. In post-war Poland that nation was completely dominated by Judaic communists: the torturer Jacek Rozanski, head of the Secret Police; the Politboro commander Jacob Berman and commissars Minc, Specht (Olszewski) and Spychalski. These men murdered or deported to Kolyma and the other Arctic death camps, tens of thousands of Catholic Poles.
Pope John Paul II confers with the Chief Rabbi of Rome inside that city's accursed synagogue.
According to researcher John Sack, "In 1945 many Poles felt (and not without reason) that Jews ran the Office of State Security...the chief of the Office was Jacob Berman, a Jew, and all or almost all the department heads were Jews."
Sack reported that 75% of the officers of the Communist Secret Police in Silesia were Jews. He noted that many Jews in the Communist terror apparatus in Poland changed their names to Polish ones like General Romkowski, Colonel Rozanski, Capt. Studencki and Lt. Jurkowski. (cf. John Sack, The New Republic, Feb. 14, 1994, p. 6).
In Poland, "...a disproportionate number of Communists were Jews. In 1930, at its peak, 35% of the members of the party were Jewish. In Communist youth organizations, Jewish membership was even higher, while Communists of Jewish origin occupied most of the seats on the central committee. Communism appealed to some Jews because it opposed anti-Semitism more vigorously than any other Polish party...Jewish Communists reached their apogee in the years immediately after World War Two, when the party leadership was totally in the hands of the prewar Communist leadership that abhorred anti-Semitism." (Sheldon Kirshner, The Canadian Jewish News, Nov. 5, 1992, p. 16).
The Catholic Primate of Poland at the time, Cardinal Hlond, a brave prelate in a stalwart tradition of Christian resistance to Judaic tyranny in Poland, so different from the traitorous philo-Judaism of the late John Paul II, stated that Polish Catholics felt resentment 'due to the Jews who today occupy leading positions in Poland's (Communist) government and endeavor to introduce a governmental structure that the majority of Poles do not wish to have." (Ibid., Kirshner).
As Piotr S. Wandycz of Yale University observed, "The average Pole could not but notice in the Stalinist era that the two most powerful men in the country--Berman and Minc--were both Jewish as was the dreaded security official Rozanski." (N.Y. Review of Books, Aug. 18, 1983, p. 51).
John Paul II covered all of this up. He was silent in the face of this holocaust against his own Christian countrymen. His silence was deafening. He turned what happened to the so-called "Jews" (more properly, Khazars), during World War Two --both real and imagined-- into the central ontological event of the 20th century, while helping to whitewash the Judaic-Communist holocaust against Christians. He even went so far as to order crosses erected in Auschwitz by Polish Catholics to be torn down at rabbinic insistence, with some of the Catholics arrested and jailed for refusing the order.
As the acknowledged representative of Christians in the world, whose side was this Pope really on? Obviously he was no advocate of Christ or of the sufferings Christ's followers experienced at the hands of Communist Khazars.
John Paul II was completely smitten with modernism and the potentates of toxic modernity, the rabbinic world leadership. He catered to and pimped for them.
The Pope defended and advanced the Pharisees' cause and falsifies and betrays the Christian. One must ask at this juncture, was he the Vicar of Christ or of the Anti-Christ?
On Nov. 2, 1997 the Vatican declared, ``Christians who yield to anti-Judaism offend God and the church itself.''
Since the Jewish religion is based on the Talmud, which Christ condemned in its oral form (Mishnah) in Mark 7:1-13 as the "tradition of the Elders," the Pope's Vatican symposium was declaring that to take a position of anti-Judaism and oppose the teachings of the Pharisees and their Talmudic traditions of the Elders--"offends God." But how can such a position offend Jesus Christ when He advocated it Himself? Has it ever been more clear that this pope was preaching a false gospel?
John Paul the Judas, herded gullible Catholics into the pen of Pharisaic annihilation. Do they imagine that the Vatican worships Jesus Christ when such a doctrine is preached by their leader? Jesus foretold, "In vain do they worship me" (Matthew 15:9). Jesus called the Jewish leadership of His day, "the children of hell" (Matthew 23:15).
The rabbinic leadership has not changed in 2,000 years. Those who expose their evil--then as now--do the very work that Jesus Christ did. In many cases the anathemas John Paul II hurled at "anti-semites" were in fact aimed at the person of Jesus Christ Himself.
By upholding the interpretation of the New Testament promulgated by the modern Scribes and Pharisees, and discarding the traditional Christian one, John Paul II virtually admitted, by his actions and pronouncements, that the Pharisees were right to crucify Christ.
It is clear that in actuality, John Paul II was not the "Vicar of Christ on earth" but a crypto-rabbi. Click on this link to view a documentary photograph of him in Warsaw, Poland, taking orders from his authentic earthly boss.
On Sunday, March 26, 2000 the Pope prayed at the "Western" or "Wailing Wall" in Jerusalem, making remarks betraying Christianity and begging the forgiveness of the heirs of Caiphas.
While in Jerusalem, the Pope bowed to the rabbinic leaders of the modern Pharisees who are unrepentant concerning the cosmic crime of deicide which their ideological forefathers perpetrated. They received no lecture or stern words of any kind from John Paul II about the need to repent and about the dread judgment they are under.
John Paul II recognized the "State of Israel" in 1993, a century after Pope St. Pius X had rebuffed Zionist leader Theodor Herzl, and Judaic rule in the Holy Land. John Paul II did not only visit "Israel" in 2000, he also went to all the most symbolic sites: Yad Vashem, the Western Wall, the President's Residence.
Oded Ben-Hur, Israel's ambassador to the Vatican, told the Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz that he shares the generally positive assessment of the deceased pope. "He had a very clear policy of rapprochement with the Jewish people and Israel. By visiting the President's Residence in Jerusalem," Ben-Hur added, "John Paul II explicitly recognized Israel's sovereignty, which none of his predecessors had been willing to do." (cf. Ha'aretz, April 4, 2005)
While in Palestine, John Paul II mentioned nothing in public concerning the Israeli holocaust against the Palestinians, but contented himself with making obeisance to the rabbis who supply the rationale for Israeli war crimes against Palestinian civilians by terming the Palestinian people "snakes" and "Amalek," and confirming the Talmudic injunctions that hold that the killing of a gentile is not murder, and that the Judaic killer in such a case is "exempt from punishment" (Sanhedrin 57a).
In Jerusalem, the Pope placed a prayer inside the "wailing-wall." The text of this prayer reads: "God of our fathers, you chose Abraham and his descendants to bring your name to the nations. We are deeply saddened by the behavior of those who in the course of history have caused these children of yours to suffer. And asking your forgiveness, we wish to commit ourselves to genuine brotherhood with the people of the covenant." -- Jerusalem, 26.3.2000. Joannes Paulus II. ( The note, written in English, was later moved to the Israeli Yad Vashem Holocaust museum to be preserved).
Not one word about Jesus Christ, His Crucifixion or Resurrection in this note, just a nonsensical supposition that the Khazar Zionists from eastern Europe who have scourged the Middle East with blood and fire, and who have as their supreme holy book not the Bible but the Talmud, are somehow "the children of Abraham and the people of the covenant." It is a strange covenant that includes neither Christ nor the Bible.
John Paul II was idolizing a nation of people, putting them on a pedestal for worship, exactly as the Talmud does. What a sad, sick joke on Christianity. John Paul II betrayed the Gospel not for 30 pieces of silver but for media approval and fame. The world loves him.
It is a tragic characteristic of our time that our people are drawn to love,
honor and worship their own executioners. From the hysterical adulation for
Reagan, who, in 1986, keelhauled the ailing, 87-year-old anti-communist
Christian patriot Andrija Artukovic -- on a hospital gurney no less -- to
the waiting arms of Tito's Communist ghouls in Yugoslavia; to the crypto-rabbi
John Paul II, it would appear that hero worship nowadays has more to do with
mind control and schizophrenia than an authentic admiration for gallant resistance
to the world, the flesh and the devil.
by Michael A. Hoffman II
Copyright 2005 revisionisthistory.org
On Apr 5, 2005, at 13:40, Tim wrote:
If this is too unseemly to you, I understand. But if you can accurately predict who the next Pope will be, before John Paul II's burial, I will donate $200 to your work. Not on the Hoffman Wire, but in a personal e-mail. On my word of honor, from Tim in Louisiana. Again, I understand if you do not wish to do this.
Keep your money. I cannot accurately predict who the next pope will be.
A top American Jesuit suggested to me that the next pope would be a pragmatic, older Italian. Some Conservatives say the new pontiff will be the black man, Francis Arinze, from Nigeria (he's alleged to be conservative). The Western media seem to be betting on a Latin American cardinal, while Aaron Lustiger of France, an ethnic Khazar in whose eyes Auschwitz trumps Calvary, would make for a fitting successor to JP-II.
Whomever it may be, chances are he'll be another charismatic type of Anti-Christ, so what difference does it make? No true Christian will make the grade.
It is like the Republicans and the Democrats, or should I say, the Ins and the Outs. One gang is in and the other is out; that's their main distinction. One Anti-Christ has died in the shadow of the stone phallus of ancient Egypt and another will rise to take his place as the new crypto-rabbi, the latest ruler of the secret Pharaonic dynasty that has reigned in Rome in the name of Christ since at least the pontificate of Sixtus the V (with several honorable exceptions, among them Leo XIII and Pius X). There was a book published in the 1970s titled, "It Didn't Start with Watergate." The Golden Gate bridge is for sale to anyone who thinks that the rot in the Roman Catholic Church started with Vatican II.
The Vatican is a ghetto, a flea market, an auction house. Look at their public parading of the pope's corpse, like a carnival sideshow Injun Joe. It's the first time I have ever felt sorry for the guy, when I saw his stuffed and costumed remains tossed in the street to be ogled by throngs of camera-wielding thrill-seekers. In the Eternal City the eternal pagan psychodrama marches on.
Look at the 1978 conclave that elected Albino Luciani (Pope John Paul I). Malachi Martin told me that Luciani was elected because Cardinal Benelli had blackmailed several other papal candidates, by circulating dossiers at the conclave containing photos of them with "their boys, their girls and their masonic papers." Martin was a double agent and everything he said must be taken cum grano salis. Still, this particular account has the ring of truth about it. The Vatican has everything to do with chess and Niccolo Machiavelli and almost nothing to do with Jesus Christ, except as a kind of advertising gimmick. If you study chess and read Machiavelli, then you will know something of the Vatican.
St. Peter's basilica is breathtakingly beautiful--an eighth wonder of the world-- but deformed by gross improprieties, like the gratuitous genitalia on the "angels" on Bernini's chapel pilasters, to say nothing of the obscene nudes on Canova's "Stuart memorial." The magnificent Sistine chapel is a veritable monument to nudity, to what John Paul II called, in the modernist argot peculiar to him, "the theology of the human body."
Michelangelo's masterworks would be appropriate anywhere, except in the House set aside for the pure worship of the God of Israel. And outside, in St. Peter's Square, sits the ensign of Pharaonic Egypt, the monstrous obelisk which dominates the entire exterior.
I am not the first to be put-off by the Vatican. John Henry Newman avoided it like the plague, and Ronald Knox was also repelled. Evelyn Waugh describes Knox's reaction: "At Easteride in 1907 he went to Rome with his brothers, followed the customary round of classical sight-seeing, was unimpressed by the baroque or by papal magnificence..." Waugh is here being diplomatic. In fact, Knox was appalled. Yet he became a Catholic anyway, in spite of the mess at the top, for the sake of the root that had not yet been extirpated.
The counterfeit papacy of John Paul II was a product of the superstar system of the media and, in a larger sense, of the archaeoastronomy of antique Egypt. I am not, by the way, declaring that Catholicism is occult, since it contains within it the seeds of the early Church. No more than I would argue that the American Republic is evil because of what usurpers from Lincoln to Wilson to George W. Bush have done in the name of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.
Usurpation is a horrid thing, but it is not new. Treason doth ever prosper, for if it prosper, none dare call it treason. The successful traitors write the history books, rule the airwaves, the palaces and the cathedrals. This is an old story. The Tudors employed no less a propagandist than William Shakespeare, who forever blackened the reputation of the rightful king of England, Richard III, and sanctioned the theft of the Crown from the House of Plantagenet. To paraphrase Hegel, what history teaches is this: that people have never learned anything from history.
We should be vigilant against usurpers, but we fail. Perhaps as a result of all those years of looking at television, we are smitten by the "leaven of the Pharisees" -- the outward show, the spectacle and theatrics. A masquerader "disguised by fearful art" (showmanship is a type of magic, i.e. "fearful art"), is pawned off on a gullible public as a holy man and even the "Vicar of Christ on earth."
In this vein, I conclude with a poem by Joyce Kilmer. I am much enamored of the World War I generation of soldier-poets; brilliant and beguiling youths like Kilmer (1886-1918), Patrick Shaw-Stewart (1888-1917), and in particular Wilfred Owen (1893-1918), who refused to hate the Germans (cf. "At a Calvary Near The Ancre" http://www.english.emory.edu/LostPoets/Owen.html), and whose "The Parable of the Old Man and the Young," is among the most devastating and savage evocations of rage at the fratricidal butchery of that wicked war, which would slay him, Shaw-Stewart, Kilmer and "half the seed of Europe."
With startling prescience, Joyce Kilmer's 1917 work, "The Robe of Christ" seems to foretell the coming of Karol Wojtyla, i.e. John Paul II, the "man of lies," who, by "fearful art," would gain the papacy ("win the robe of Christ)" by posing as a wounded type of alter Christus.
by Joyce Kilmer
At the foot of the Cross on Calvary
Three soldiers sat and diced,
And one of them was the Devil
And he won the Robe of Christ...
...I saw him through a thousand veils,
And has not this sufficed?
Now, must I look on the Devil robed
In the radiant Robe of Christ?
He comes, and his face is sad and mild,
With thorns his head is crowned;
There are great bleeding wounds in his feet,
And in each hand a wound.
How can I tell, who am a fool,
If this be Christ or no?
Those bleeding hands outstretched to me!
Those eyes that love me so!
I see the Robe -- I look -- I hope --
I fear -- but there is one
Who will direct my troubled mind;
Christ's Mother knows her Son.
O Mother of Good Counsel, lend
Intelligence to me!
Encompass me with wisdom,
Thou Tower of Ivory!
"This is the Man of Lies," she says,
"Disguised with fearful art:
He has the wounded hands and feet,
But not the wounded heart."
Beside the Cross on Calvary
She watched them as they diced.
She saw the Devil join the game
And win the Robe of Christ.