think about this very carefully people, in particular think about the numbers.
What they mean in simple terms is that for every 2.2 inexperienced American
infantrymen exposed in full view across the length and breadth of Iraq, there is
one carefully hidden and highly trained Iraqi equivalent of a Fort Bragg Green
Beret. The Iraqi Special Forces teams have all the cover, know their own areas
intimately, have plenty of food, are armed to the teeth, and take no chances
whatsoever. They kill Americans on their own terms whenever they want to, which
means that the war of attrition is strictly a one-way affair against the
invasion forces. The reason you probably do not know this already, is because of
deliberate endemic disinformation peddled night and day by the
Zionist-controlled corporate media.
blatant and continually recycled lie is that 'foreign insurgents' and 'al Qaeda
terrorists' are to blame for western soldiers being killed and critically
injured in Iraq, but nothing could be further from the truth. Veteran journalist
Robert Fisk trashed this lie completely when he visited Baghdad Airport several
weeks ago. Out of approximately 5,000 prisoners held at the airport, less than
200 were non-Iraqis, of whom Fisk reported, "more than ninety-percent were
already living and working in Iraq before the invasion". The truth of the matter
is that the Zionists are now frantic to complete their impossible dream of
stealing Iraq's oil reserves, and intend to sacrifice your son in an illegal
'war' that can never be won.
understand Iraq today, we need to look briefly at how the Republican Guard
handled the initial invasion, why its members abandoned all of their armored
vehicles, and why they deliberately left the Gates of Baghdad open for the
American invaders. Then we need to examine the vast arsenals of Iraqi
conventional weaponry available to the thousands of small Republican Guard
counter-insurgency teams, and some of their asymmetric warfare techniques.
Before we do that, let us first work out 'who is who' in this unequal contest,
because propaganda used by the western corporate media has led to considerable
Though the New
York Times and others would have you believe that Iraqis fighting to free Iraq
from illegal occupation are "insurgents", this is not correct. America, Britain
and Australia illegally invaded a sovereign nation state recognized
internationally as such, then undermined, imprisoned or expelled members of
Iraq's recognized government, while committing gross acts of terrorism including
mass murder against Iraqi nationals. By strict legal as well as moral
definition, America, Britain and Australia are the "insurgents" in Iraq. Those
Iraqis who try to defend their families against these gross acts of terrorism on
their own sovereign territory, are "counter insurgents".
to be sidetracked by meaningless mumbo jumbo about "Weapons of Mass
Destruction", or accusations of President Saddam Hussein committing heinous
crimes within Iraq, for both are creative media red herrings. In the first case,
America has more weapons of mass destruction than any other nation on earth, and
in the second, internal criminal behavior is a national matter, and not a lawful
excuse to invade a sovereign country. For example, I currently live in
Australia, where obsequious Prime Minister John Howard takes his orders direct
from the Zionist Lobby in New York, which amounts to high treason under
Australian constitutional law. But distasteful and unlawful though they may be,
Howard's proven crimes at the internal national level, do not give China or
North Korea a legitimate excuse to invade this sovereign country.
since 1991, Iraq has known that America intended to invade one day, and thus had
plenty of time to make elaborate preparations. And as each year passed by after
that, with American bombs wantonly raining down and murdering their women and
children in the illegal northern and southern "No Fly Zones", Iraqi
determination to fight back grew, especially on the part of the Iraqi Military
High Command. It was obvious to the generals that Iraq could never hope to
defeat American air superiority, nor could it defeat modern American battle
tanks like the Abrams, so from late1996 onwards, Iraqi strategy and tactics
became exclusively asymmetric.
old-fashioned chemical weapons of the kind Iraq and Iran fired at each during
the eighties were a strict "no no", because their very presence would be the
only excuse the Zionists would need to shower Baghdad, Tikrit, and Mosul with
tactical nuclear weapons. Accordingly, old chemical weapon stocks were
destroyed, while at the same time Iraqi military personnel distributed vast
quantities of conventional weapons to thousands of different [mostly buried]
caches across the country.
1999, the Iraqi military had achieved what many western observers might well
think was impossible. Because of the widespread caches and multiple bunkers,
members of the Republican Guard would never be more than ten miles away from a
weapon supply. Each basic cache contains high explosives for culvert bombs,
radio detonators, basic remote control kits for cars and light trucks, rocket
propelled grenades, hand grenades, mortar bombs, light machine guns, assault
rifles and ammunition.